Skip to main content

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

Why Doesn’t Venus Have a Moon? A New Study May Have Solved One of the Solar System’s Biggest Mysteries

Venus is often called Earth’s “twin” because it is similar to Earth in size, mass and density. But despite these similarities, Venus is an extremely strange world. Its surface is hot enough to melt lead, its atmosphere is incredibly thick, and it rotates in the opposite direction to most planets in the Solar System.

There is another major difference that has puzzled scientists for decades: Venus has no moon.

Earth has a large natural satellite that strongly influences its planet. Mars has two tiny moons, while the outer planets have dozens. Even much smaller bodies in the Solar System can have satellites.

So why does Venus have none?

Did Venus simply fail to form a moon? Or did it once have one that eventually disappeared?

A new study led by planetary scientist Stephen R. Kane explores a fascinating possibility: Venus may once have had a moon, but the planet itself could have caused its destruction.

The Mystery of Venus’s Missing Moon

Scientists have proposed several explanations for Venus’s lack of a natural satellite.

One possibility is that Venus never formed a moon in the first place. Another is that a massive collision could have created a moon, similar to the leading theory for the formation of Earth’s Moon, but that the satellite later escaped or was destroyed.

However, the new research explores a different scenario.

According to the study, Venus could have formed with a moon that initially behaved normally. Over time, however, interactions between the planet and its satellite may have changed the moon’s orbit dramatically.

Eventually, the moon could have spiraled back toward Venus and been destroyed.

The researchers do not claim to have discovered definitive evidence that Venus once had a moon. Instead, their computer simulations show that such a scenario is physically possible under certain conditions.

Investigating a Moon That No Longer Exists

But how can scientists investigate something that may have disappeared billions of years ago?

They cannot observe the missing moon directly. Instead, they can use physics and computer simulations to reconstruct possible histories.

Kane and his team created models covering approximately 4.5 billion years, roughly the age of the Solar System. They tested different combinations of variables that could have influenced the evolution of a hypothetical Venusian moon.

These included the moon’s mass, its distance from Venus, Venus’s rotation speed and the planet’s internal tidal friction.

The researchers then ran simulations to see what happened to the hypothetical moon over extremely long periods.

Some scenarios allowed the moon to remain in orbit for billions of years.

Others produced a very different result.

The moon could initially move away from Venus, only for its orbital evolution to eventually reverse. It would then begin moving back toward the planet.

That reversal is one of the most intriguing parts of the study.

How Could a Moon Move Away and Then Come Back?

The answer involves tidal interactions.

When two large objects orbit one another, their gravitational interaction can gradually transfer energy and angular momentum between their rotation and orbital motion.

Earth provides a useful example.

Our Moon is currently slowly moving away from Earth. Measurements show that the Moon's average distance from Earth increases by roughly a few centimeters each year.

But Venus may have experienced a very different evolutionary path.

The simulations suggest that, depending on Venus’s original rotation rate and the moon’s properties, tidal interactions could first push the moon outward.

Then, as Venus’s rotation changed, the direction of orbital evolution could reverse.

The moon would begin migrating inward.

Eventually, it could approach Venus so closely that tidal forces would become destructive.

At that point, the moon could have broken apart, collided with Venus or otherwise been absorbed into the planet.

Venus May Have Destroyed Its Own Moon

This leads to the study’s most fascinating conclusion.

The researchers suggest that, among the possible scenarios, Venus’s missing moon may have been destroyed after spiraling back toward the planet.

Depending on the moon’s mass and Venus’s initial rotation, the simulations produced destruction times ranging from about 30 million years to 1.7 billion years after the moon formed.

That is an enormous range, but it represents only a small portion of the Solar System’s 4.5-billion-year history.

If this scenario is correct, Venus did not necessarily need a massive external catastrophe to lose its moon.

The planet may have effectively been responsible for its own satellite’s disappearance.

The researchers describe the absence of a Venusian satellite as a possible natural consequence of the planet’s initial conditions, rather than something that necessarily required a separate catastrophic event.

In simple terms, the moon may have been doomed by the way Venus was born and evolved.

Why Venus and Earth Became So Different

This possibility could also help scientists understand one of the biggest mysteries in planetary science: why Earth and Venus, despite their similarities, evolved into such dramatically different worlds.

Earth became a relatively mild, life-supporting planet with oceans, continents and a large Moon.

Venus developed into a scorching world covered by a dense carbon-dioxide atmosphere, with surface temperatures around 465°C.

Their differences extend beyond their atmospheres and temperatures. Their rotations, magnetic environments, geological histories and interactions with their satellites have also evolved differently.

The presence of a large Moon may have influenced Earth’s long-term history in several ways, including its rotational dynamics and tidal environment.

If Venus once had a moon, its presence — and eventual disappearance — could therefore represent an important difference between the two planets.

The researchers suggest that the presence or absence of a moon during Venus’s early history may have been an important branching point in the evolutionary paths of Earth and Venus.

But Did Venus Really Have a Moon?

There is an important caveat.

The new research does not prove that Venus once possessed a moon.

The study is based on mathematical modeling and computer simulations. The researchers are exploring whether particular evolutionary histories are physically possible and how likely different outcomes might be.

There is currently no surviving Venusian moon for scientists to examine, and no direct observation confirms that one existed.

That means the mystery is not completely solved.

Nevertheless, the simulations provide a compelling explanation for how Venus could have lost a moon without requiring an extraordinary external event.

A Planet That May Have Erased Its Own History

Perhaps the most fascinating idea is that Venus’s missing moon may not have been stolen by another planet, blasted away by a collision or lost into deep space.

It may have simply been caught in a long gravitational dance with Venus.

First, the moon could have moved outward.

Then Venus’s changing rotation may have altered the direction of its orbital evolution.

The moon could have turned around, gradually spiraling inward over millions or even billions of years.

Finally, it may have met its fate against the very planet it once orbited.

If future observations and studies support this scenario, Venus could become an even more remarkable example of how planetary systems evolve.

The mystery also offers scientists an important lesson: two planets can begin with similar ingredients and still follow completely different evolutionary paths.

Earth and Venus may look like twins from a distance, but their histories could have diverged very early — perhaps even because one planet kept its moon while the other lost it.

For now, Venus remains moonless.

But the possibility that it once had a satellite — and that Venus itself ultimately destroyed it — gives scientists a fascinating new way to investigate the hidden history of our planetary neighbor.

Reference: Stephen R. Kane et al, Tidal Demise: The Evolution and Fate of a Hypothetical Venus Moon, arXiv (2026). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2608.25036

Comments

Popular

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

For years, scientists believed that adding even one qubit (a unit of quantum information) to a black hole needed energy. This was based on the idea that a black hole’s entropy must increase with more information, which means it must gain energy. But a new study by Jonah Kudler-Flam and Geoff Penington changes that thinking. They found that quantum information can be teleported into a black hole without adding energy or increasing entropy . This works through a process called black hole decoherence , where “soft” radiation — very low-energy signals — carry information into the black hole. In their method, the qubit enters the black hole while a new pair of entangled particles (like Hawking radiation) is created. This keeps the total information balanced, so there's no violation of the laws of physics. The energy cost only shows up when information is erased from the outside — these are called zerobits . According to Landauer’s principle, erasing information always needs energy. But ...

A New Type of Wormhole Could Slowly Become Stable Over Time, Scientists Suggest

For many years, wormholes have captured the imagination of scientists and science fiction fans. They are often shown as magical tunnels through space that can connect two faraway places in the universe. If wormholes really exist, they could one day make it possible to travel huge distances in a very short time. But there is one big problem—no one has ever found a real wormhole. They remain only theoretical objects predicted by the mathematics of Einstein's theory of general relativity. Even though they have never been observed, physicists continue studying them because they help us understand the limits of gravity and spacetime. Now, researchers Ditta and Channuie have proposed a new model of a time-dependent traversable wormhole . Unlike many earlier models, their wormhole is not completely still. Instead, it changes with time because energy flows through it. As this flow slowly fades away, the wormhole naturally becomes stable. Their study offers a new and simple way to understan...

Black Holes That Never Dies

Black holes are powerful objects in space with gravity so strong that nothing can escape them. In the 1970s, Stephen Hawking showed that black holes can slowly lose energy by giving off tiny particles. This process is called Hawking radiation . Over time, the black hole gets smaller and hotter, and in the end, it disappears completely. But new research by Menezes and his team shows something different. Using a theory called Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) , they studied black holes with quantum corrections. In their model, the black hole does not vanish completely. Instead, it stops shrinking when it reaches a very small size. This leftover is called a black hole remnant . They also studied something called grey-body factors , which affect how much energy escapes from a black hole. Their findings show that the black hole cools down and stops losing mass once it reaches a minimum mass . This new model removes the idea of a “singularity” at the center of the black hole and gives us a better ...