Skip to main content

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

Does Falling Quantum Object Feels Gravity?

For more than 100 years, modern physics has been built around two powerful theories. Quantum mechanics explains how extremely small objects such as atoms and particles behave, while Albert Einstein’s theory of gravity explains how gravity affects matter, motion and the structure of the universe.

Both theories have been extraordinarily successful. Yet there is still a major unanswered question: How do quantum mechanics and gravity work together?

Now, an international team of scientists has taken an important step toward answering that question. Researchers from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, the University of Ulm and the University of Oxford, along with collaborators from other institutions, have observed a long-predicted effect of gravity on a falling quantum object.

The study, published in Science Advances on September 2, involved Nobel Prize-winning physicist Professor Sir Roger Penrose. The experiment shows that a fundamental idea behind Einstein's description of gravity—the equivalence principle—continues to agree with the behavior of matter in the quantum world.

Importantly, the result does not mean scientists have finally unified quantum mechanics and gravity. Instead, it provides a new experimental connection between the two areas of physics.

A 100-Year-Old Principle Enters the Quantum World

At the center of the experiment is Einstein's equivalence principle.

In simple terms, the principle says that gravity can locally appear to disappear for an observer who is freely falling. Imagine being inside an elevator that is falling freely. For a short period, everything inside would appear weightless because the elevator and everything inside it are falling together.

This idea is a cornerstone of Einstein's theory of gravity and has been tested extremely accurately using ordinary objects.

But there was an important unanswered question.

What happens when the falling object is not an ordinary object, but a quantum object?

Quantum objects can behave in ways that seem very different from our everyday experience. An atom, for example, can exist in a quantum superposition, meaning its quantum wave can effectively follow more than one path at the same time.

Testing Einstein's principle under these conditions is extremely challenging.

The new experiment was designed to do exactly that.

The Quantum Galileo Interferometer

The researchers developed a special experimental system called the Quantum Galileo Interferometer.

The name refers to Galileo's famous studies of falling objects, but the new apparatus investigates falling objects at the quantum level.

The experiment used clouds of rubidium atoms cooled to temperatures just above absolute zero. At such extremely low temperatures, the atoms can be controlled with remarkable precision and their quantum behavior becomes easier to observe.

The atoms were positioned close to a specially designed atom chip, which contained tiny electrical wires capable of producing carefully controlled magnetic fields.

The researchers first used microwave pulses to place the atoms into a quantum superposition.

This effectively created two parts of the same atomic quantum wave that could follow different paths.

One part was kept stationary relative to the laboratory, while the other was allowed to fall under gravity.

That difference was crucial.

One Quantum Wave, Two Different Experiences

The scientists used magnetic fields to control the two parts of the atomic wave.

One part experienced a carefully adjusted upward magnetic force that balanced the downward pull of Earth's gravity. As a result, this portion of the wave remained essentially stationary relative to the laboratory.

The second portion was given an upward push using a precisely controlled magnetic pulse. It was then placed into a state that was almost unaffected by the magnetic field.

Gravity could therefore act on it freely.

The second part followed a ballistic trajectory, similar to the path of a ball thrown upward into the air.

However, there was a remarkable difference: this was not simply two ordinary atoms following two paths. The researchers were controlling different components of a single quantum wave.

After the falling portion had traveled along its trajectory, another carefully controlled magnetic pulse brought the two parts back together.

When quantum waves meet, they can interfere with one another.

This interference contains information about how the two paths differed.

Measuring an Extremely Tiny Quantum Effect

The key measurement was the quantum phase difference between the two parts of the atomic wave.

While one part was held in place and the other experienced free fall, the two portions accumulated slightly different quantum phases.

When they were reunited, this difference produced a measurable interference pattern.

The measured phase matched the value predicted when Einstein's equivalence principle is applied to a quantum wave.

In other words, the experiment showed that the behavior of the falling quantum object was consistent with a fundamental principle of Einstein's theory.

The result is significant because previous experiments have already used quantum systems to measure gravity. However, the researchers describe this experiment as the first direct measurement of the predicted quantum phase associated with a freely falling object.

Does This Finally Unite Quantum Mechanics and Gravity?

Not yet.

It is important not to overstate what the experiment has demonstrated.

The study does not provide a complete theory combining quantum mechanics with Einstein's theory of gravity.

It also does not prove that gravity itself is quantum.

Instead, it shows that within the experimental conditions tested, Einstein's equivalence principle remains compatible with quantum mechanics.

This is important because physicists still do not have a complete framework explaining how gravity should behave at the quantum level.

Quantum mechanics works extremely well for microscopic systems, while Einstein's general theory of relativity provides an exceptionally successful description of gravity on larger scales.

The difficulty comes when both descriptions are expected to operate simultaneously.

Experiments such as this one help scientists understand where the two theories agree—and eventually where they might begin to differ.

Roger Penrose's Bigger Question

The experiment is also connected to an important idea proposed by Professor Sir Roger Penrose.

Penrose has argued that quantum mechanics might eventually break down for sufficiently massive objects placed in quantum superpositions for long enough periods.

The current experiment does not test that idea directly.

The rubidium atoms used here are far too small, and the experimental timescales are not sufficient to reach the regime required to investigate such a possible breakdown of quantum mechanics.

However, the researchers see the new technique as a potential step toward much more ambitious experiments.

Their future goal includes testing heavier objects, potentially including nanodiamonds, in quantum superpositions.

If scientists can create and maintain quantum superpositions involving increasingly massive objects, they may eventually be able to investigate whether the laws of quantum mechanics remain valid indefinitely—or whether gravity introduces a fundamental limit.

Why This Experiment Matters

The importance of the study goes beyond simply observing atoms falling under Earth's gravity.

For decades, physicists have been trying to understand whether the principles governing the quantum world can coexist with Einstein's description of gravity.

The new experiment provides evidence that, at least in the regime accessible to current technology, they can.

It demonstrates that a quantum object can be placed in a carefully controlled superposition, allowed to experience free fall, and then measured in a way that reveals the gravitational effect predicted by Einstein's principle.

Professor Ron Folman of Ben-Gurion University described the work as combining a technically difficult experiment with a much broader theoretical question: how gravity and quantum theory could ultimately fit into one understanding of the universe.

University of Oxford physicist Professor Vlatko Vedral similarly emphasized that the experiment pushes quantum mechanics toward one of its most intriguing frontiers—gravity—while showing that its predictions continue to hold.

A Small Atom, A Huge Physics Question

The experiment may involve tiny rubidium atoms, but the question behind it is enormous.

Can the laws of quantum mechanics and gravity ultimately be part of the same fundamental theory?

Scientists still do not know.

What this experiment provides is not the final answer, but another important piece of evidence.

It shows that when a quantum object falls freely under gravity, its quantum behavior follows the prediction associated with Einstein's equivalence principle.

The researchers now hope to push these experiments further, using heavier objects and longer-lasting quantum superpositions.

If future experiments reach a regime where quantum mechanics and gravity begin to disagree, scientists could be looking at clues pointing toward a completely new understanding of nature.

For now, however, the message is clear: even in the strange quantum world, Einstein's century-old principle continues to hold up.

Reference: 

  • Or Dobkowski et al.
,
Observation of the quantum phase of free fall and the consistency with the equivalence principle.Sci. Adv.12,eaec8045(2026).DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aec8045

Comments

Popular

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

For years, scientists believed that adding even one qubit (a unit of quantum information) to a black hole needed energy. This was based on the idea that a black hole’s entropy must increase with more information, which means it must gain energy. But a new study by Jonah Kudler-Flam and Geoff Penington changes that thinking. They found that quantum information can be teleported into a black hole without adding energy or increasing entropy . This works through a process called black hole decoherence , where “soft” radiation — very low-energy signals — carry information into the black hole. In their method, the qubit enters the black hole while a new pair of entangled particles (like Hawking radiation) is created. This keeps the total information balanced, so there's no violation of the laws of physics. The energy cost only shows up when information is erased from the outside — these are called zerobits . According to Landauer’s principle, erasing information always needs energy. But ...

A New Type of Wormhole Could Slowly Become Stable Over Time, Scientists Suggest

For many years, wormholes have captured the imagination of scientists and science fiction fans. They are often shown as magical tunnels through space that can connect two faraway places in the universe. If wormholes really exist, they could one day make it possible to travel huge distances in a very short time. But there is one big problem—no one has ever found a real wormhole. They remain only theoretical objects predicted by the mathematics of Einstein's theory of general relativity. Even though they have never been observed, physicists continue studying them because they help us understand the limits of gravity and spacetime. Now, researchers Ditta and Channuie have proposed a new model of a time-dependent traversable wormhole . Unlike many earlier models, their wormhole is not completely still. Instead, it changes with time because energy flows through it. As this flow slowly fades away, the wormhole naturally becomes stable. Their study offers a new and simple way to understan...

Black Holes That Never Dies

Black holes are powerful objects in space with gravity so strong that nothing can escape them. In the 1970s, Stephen Hawking showed that black holes can slowly lose energy by giving off tiny particles. This process is called Hawking radiation . Over time, the black hole gets smaller and hotter, and in the end, it disappears completely. But new research by Menezes and his team shows something different. Using a theory called Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) , they studied black holes with quantum corrections. In their model, the black hole does not vanish completely. Instead, it stops shrinking when it reaches a very small size. This leftover is called a black hole remnant . They also studied something called grey-body factors , which affect how much energy escapes from a black hole. Their findings show that the black hole cools down and stops losing mass once it reaches a minimum mass . This new model removes the idea of a “singularity” at the center of the black hole and gives us a better ...