Skip to main content

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

Scientists Found a Way to Build Stable Machines Using Only Unstable Parts

Imagine a robot that can keep its balance without cameras, sensors, or powerful computer software. Or buildings and machines that remain stable without constantly monitoring every movement. It may sound like science fiction, but researchers have now discovered a surprising law of physics that could make it possible.

Scientists from NYU Tandon School of Engineering and Stony Brook University have demonstrated that two unstable mechanical behaviors can combine to create a stable system—if they are switched at exactly the right rhythm. Their groundbreaking study, published in Nature Communications, could change how engineers design robots, aircraft, buildings, and even futuristic metamaterials.

A New Way to Keep Machines Stable

Many modern machines rely on active control systems to remain stable.

For example, a walking robot constantly uses sensors to detect its position and software to calculate how to avoid falling. Aircraft wings use sensors and control systems to prevent dangerous vibrations. Even industrial machines continuously monitor their motion to stay safe.

These technologies work well, but they come with disadvantages. They require expensive sensors, fast processors, complex software, and continuous power.

The new research suggests there may be another way.

Instead of constantly correcting movement, engineers could simply let the laws of physics do the work.

The "Frankenstein Oscillator"

To test their idea, the researchers built a unique experimental device that they jokingly called the "Frankenstein oscillator."

The setup was surprisingly simple. It consisted of a thin plastic strip fixed at one end with a small weight attached to the other.

The scientists then introduced two completely different types of instability, both of which would normally make the system lose balance.

The first instability was created using a magnetic coil, which pushed the strip away from its resting position. Imagine trying to balance a ball on the curved top of a saddle. Even the smallest movement causes the ball to slide away. This is exactly the kind of instability the magnet produced.

The second instability came from a small fan blowing air across the strip. Instead of slowing down its movement, the airflow added energy, making the strip swing more and more—similar to pushing a playground swing at exactly the right moment so it goes higher each time.

Normally, either of these forces alone would make the system unstable.

But then the researchers did something unexpected.

The Secret Was Perfect Timing

Instead of applying both forces continuously, the team switched them on and off in carefully timed pulses.

They discovered something remarkable.

When the switching occurred within a very narrow time window—between approximately 218 and 238 milliseconds—the plastic strip remained almost perfectly still.

Outside that timing window, everything failed. The strip quickly became unstable and swung wildly.

In other words, two unstable behaviors combined to produce stability—but only when they were switched at the right rhythm.

Once the timing was set, no sensors, software, or continuous corrections were needed.

Physics handled everything automatically.

Inspired by a Famous Physics Experiment

This surprising discovery builds upon a classic concept known as Kapitza's Pendulum, named after Nobel Prize-winning Russian physicist Pyotr Kapitza.

Normally, an upside-down pendulum falls immediately because it is naturally unstable.

However, Kapitza showed that if the base of the pendulum vibrates at exactly the right frequency, the inverted pendulum remains standing upright without anyone controlling it.

It appears almost magical, but it is simply physics.

The new research asked an even more difficult question.

What happens if both states are unstable?

Can instability itself somehow create stability?

Surprisingly, the answer turned out to be yes.

How Can Two Wrong Things Become Right?

At first glance, the idea seems impossible.

How can combining two unstable systems make anything stable?

The explanation lies in how each instability behaves.

The magnetic instability pushes the motion away from equilibrium, but it also contains one special direction where movement naturally becomes smaller instead of larger.

Meanwhile, the airflow instability constantly rotates the direction of motion.

If the switching happens at precisely the correct rhythm, the rotating motion repeatedly steers the system into that shrinking direction before the instability has time to grow.

As a result, each unstable behavior effectively cancels out the other's tendency to become unstable.

The outcome is a stable system created entirely from unstable components.

More Than Twenty Years of Research

The discovery did not happen overnight.

Professor Maurizio Porfiri, senior author of the study and director at NYU Tandon, said he had been thinking about this problem for more than two decades.

For many years, he believed that stabilizing two unstable systems would require highly complex nonlinear physics or even chaotic behavior.

Instead, the answer turned out to be much simpler.

A basic linear mechanical system was enough to achieve the effect.

The researchers first developed the mathematical theory and then tested it experimentally using the plastic beam.

The laboratory results matched the theoretical predictions almost perfectly, confirming that the phenomenon is real.

A Difficult Experiment That Finally Worked

Co-author Paolo Celli from Stony Brook University admitted that he initially doubted whether the experiment would succeed.

Creating a system with multiple independent sources of instability is extremely challenging.

Yet after carefully designing the experiment, the researchers observed exactly the narrow stability window predicted by their calculations.

Seeing theory become reality was one of the most exciting moments of the project.

The success gives researchers confidence that the same principle could be applied to many other engineering systems.

What Could This Mean for the Future?

The implications of this discovery could be enormous.

Future robots may require far fewer sensors and less computing power because their stability could come directly from carefully designed physical motion.

Aircraft components could naturally suppress dangerous vibrations without complex control electronics.

Bridges and buildings might use similar principles to reduce unwanted oscillations during earthquakes or strong winds.

The research could also help engineers develop advanced metamaterials—artificial materials with extraordinary mechanical properties that are difficult or impossible to create using traditional design methods.

Network systems, mechanical devices, and other structures operating close to instability could also benefit from this new approach.

A New Philosophy for Engineering

Perhaps the most exciting part of this discovery is the new way of thinking it introduces.

For decades, engineers have treated instability as something that must always be eliminated.

This research suggests the opposite may sometimes be true.

Instead of fighting instability, engineers may learn to use carefully controlled instability to create stability.

By allowing physics to perform the hard work naturally, future technologies could become simpler, more energy-efficient, cheaper, and more reliable.

It is a powerful reminder that nature often hides elegant solutions where we least expect them—and sometimes, the key to perfect stability is not avoiding instability at all, but using it wisely.

ReferenceXiedeng, D., Celli, P. & Porfiri, M. Dynamic stabilization of a mechanical oscillator in the absence of any stable feature. Nat Commun 17, 6024 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70493-1

Comments

Popular

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

For years, scientists believed that adding even one qubit (a unit of quantum information) to a black hole needed energy. This was based on the idea that a black hole’s entropy must increase with more information, which means it must gain energy. But a new study by Jonah Kudler-Flam and Geoff Penington changes that thinking. They found that quantum information can be teleported into a black hole without adding energy or increasing entropy . This works through a process called black hole decoherence , where “soft” radiation — very low-energy signals — carry information into the black hole. In their method, the qubit enters the black hole while a new pair of entangled particles (like Hawking radiation) is created. This keeps the total information balanced, so there's no violation of the laws of physics. The energy cost only shows up when information is erased from the outside — these are called zerobits . According to Landauer’s principle, erasing information always needs energy. But ...

Black Holes That Never Dies

Black holes are powerful objects in space with gravity so strong that nothing can escape them. In the 1970s, Stephen Hawking showed that black holes can slowly lose energy by giving off tiny particles. This process is called Hawking radiation . Over time, the black hole gets smaller and hotter, and in the end, it disappears completely. But new research by Menezes and his team shows something different. Using a theory called Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) , they studied black holes with quantum corrections. In their model, the black hole does not vanish completely. Instead, it stops shrinking when it reaches a very small size. This leftover is called a black hole remnant . They also studied something called grey-body factors , which affect how much energy escapes from a black hole. Their findings show that the black hole cools down and stops losing mass once it reaches a minimum mass . This new model removes the idea of a “singularity” at the center of the black hole and gives us a better ...

How Planetary Movements Might Explain Sunspot Cycles and Solar Phenomena

Sunspots, dark patches on the Sun's surface, follow a cycle of increasing and decreasing activity every 11 years. For years, scientists have relied on the dynamo model to explain this cycle. According to this model, the Sun's magnetic field is generated by the movement of plasma and the Sun's rotation. However, this model does not fully explain why the sunspot cycle is sometimes unpredictable. Lauri Jetsu, a researcher, has proposed a new approach. Jetsu’s analysis, using a method called the Discrete Chi-square Method (DCM), suggests that planetary movements, especially those of Earth, Jupiter, and Mercury, play a key role in driving the sunspot cycle. His theory focuses on Flux Transfer Events (FTEs), where the magnetic fields of these planets interact with the Sun’s magnetic field. These interactions could create the sunspots and explain other solar phenomena like the Sun’s magnetic polarity reversing every 11 years. The Sun, our closest star, has been a subject of scient...