Skip to main content

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

Your Brain May Be Secretly Blocking Negative Words Before You Even Hear Them

Every day, our brains process an enormous amount of information. Conversations, sounds, advertisements, social media posts, and background noise constantly compete for our attention. Most people assume that emotionally negative words—such as insults, threats, or disturbing statements—are especially difficult to ignore. After all, a harsh comment or alarming phrase often seems to stand out immediately.

But a fascinating new study suggests that our brains may be doing something unexpected behind the scenes. Instead of prioritizing negative words, the unconscious mind may actually be filtering them out before they ever reach conscious awareness.

Researchers from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem discovered that people were less likely to consciously notice negative spoken words than neutral words, even when those words were clearly present in what they were hearing. The findings provide a new glimpse into how the brain decides what information deserves our attention and what information remains hidden from conscious awareness.

The Mystery of Conscious Awareness

Scientists have long known that the brain performs a huge amount of work outside of conscious awareness. Much of our perception, decision-making, and information processing happens automatically without us realizing it.

One of the biggest questions in psychology and neuroscience is understanding how the brain chooses which information enters consciousness.

Think of consciousness as a spotlight. At any given moment, only a small portion of the information around us enters that spotlight. Everything else remains in the background.

Researchers want to know what determines whether something reaches that spotlight or stays hidden.

Understanding this process is important because information that remains outside awareness can still influence our thoughts, emotions, and behavior. Even when we don't consciously notice something, our brains may still process it.

Why Studying Spoken Words Is Difficult

Most previous research on unconscious processing has focused on vision.

Scientists often show participants images so briefly that they cannot consciously report seeing them. These experiments help researchers study how the brain processes information without awareness.

Speech, however, presents a unique challenge.

Unlike images, spoken words unfold over time. A word cannot simply be flashed for a fraction of a second. Researchers therefore have fewer tools for studying how the brain processes spoken language before conscious awareness occurs.

This limitation has left an important question unanswered:

Can the emotional meaning of spoken words influence whether we become consciously aware of them?

The research team decided to investigate.

Designing the Experiment

The study involved 101 Hebrew-speaking adults.

Participants were asked to perform a visual task that required concentration. They viewed figurines on a screen and had to determine whether each figure matched the one shown previously.

At the same time, they listened to a stream of meaningless made-up words called pseudowords.

Hidden within these streams were occasional real Hebrew words.

Some of these real words carried negative emotional meaning, while others were emotionally neutral.

After hearing the audio, participants were asked whether they noticed a real word and completed additional tests designed to measure awareness.

The researchers expected negative words to stand out.

This prediction seemed reasonable because many previous studies have shown that emotionally negative information captures attention and influences behavior.

Lead researcher Gal R. Chen explained that the team initially assumed participants would be more likely to notice negative words.

The results, however, told a very different story.

An Unexpected Discovery

Instead of drawing attention, negative words were actually less likely to be consciously noticed.

Participants consistently detected neutral words more often than negative ones.

The finding surprised the researchers.

In fact, the results were so unexpected that the team initially wondered whether something had gone wrong.

To verify the outcome, they repeated the experiment with additional words.

The same pattern appeared again.

Neutral words continued to reach conscious awareness more frequently than negative words.

This was not a random error.

Something systematic seemed to be happening inside the brain.

Testing the Finding Again

Researchers wanted to know whether the effect only occurred when participants were working hard on the visual task.

Perhaps the demanding task left fewer mental resources available, making negative words easier to miss.

To test this possibility, they redesigned the experiment.

This time, participants completed a much simpler visual task that required far less concentration.

If mental workload were responsible, the difference between neutral and negative words should disappear.

But it didn't.

Even during the easier task, participants still noticed neutral words more often than negative ones.

The effect remained remarkably consistent.

This suggested that the phenomenon was not simply caused by distraction or mental overload.

Instead, it appeared to reflect a deeper feature of how the unconscious mind selects information for awareness.

Why Would the Brain Hide Negative Words?

The researchers believe the answer may involve psychological cost.

Consciously experiencing negative information can be mentally demanding.

Negative words can trigger stress, distraction, worry, or emotional discomfort.

From an efficiency standpoint, bringing every potentially upsetting piece of information into awareness may not always be beneficial.

The brain may sometimes decide that certain negative information is not worth the cost of conscious processing.

In other words, the unconscious mind may act as a protective gatekeeper.

When a person is focused on an important task, the brain may suppress potentially disruptive information before it reaches awareness.

According to Chen, random negative words appearing during another activity may interfere with performance and concentration.

As a result, the unconscious system might be biased toward keeping such information outside consciousness whenever possible.

This interpretation challenges common assumptions about attention.

While negative information often appears powerful and attention-grabbing, the unconscious mind may sometimes work actively to prevent it from entering awareness in the first place.

What This Means for Mental Health

The findings could have important implications for understanding mental health conditions.

Many disorders involve unusual responses to negative information.

For example, people with anxiety disorders often become highly sensitive to threatening or negative stimuli. Individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may also experience heightened awareness of emotionally disturbing information.

The new research raises an intriguing possibility.

Perhaps healthy individuals possess an unconscious filtering system that reduces exposure to negative information before it reaches awareness.

If that system functions differently in people with anxiety, phobias, or PTSD, it could help explain why negative thoughts and experiences become so difficult to ignore.

Researchers hope future studies will investigate whether this unconscious gatekeeper operates differently across various clinical populations.

Understanding these differences could eventually contribute to better treatments and interventions.

Important Limitations

Like all scientific studies, this research has limitations.

The experiment focused on single spoken words rather than real conversations.

In everyday life, people rarely hear isolated words without context. Conversations, stories, and social interactions are much more complex.

The researchers also examined only negative and neutral words.

They did not test highly positive words, emotionally exciting words, or taboo language. These categories may produce different results.

Future studies will need to explore whether the same unconscious filtering occurs in more realistic listening situations and with a wider range of emotional content.

A New Perspective on the Unconscious Mind

The study offers a fascinating reminder that our conscious experience represents only a small part of what the brain is doing.

We often assume that what captures our attention reflects our deepest mental priorities. But the findings suggest that unconscious processes may quietly shape our experience long before we become aware of anything.

Rather than automatically highlighting negative information, the brain may sometimes protect us by keeping certain emotionally costly information out of awareness altogether.

If future research confirms these findings, it could reshape how scientists understand attention, consciousness, emotion, and mental health.

For now, the study provides an intriguing glimpse into an invisible mental gatekeeper—one that may be deciding every day which words reach your awareness and which never make it into the spotlight of consciousness.

Reference: Gal R. Chen et al, Conscious Detection of Spoken Words Depends on Their Valence, Psychological Science (2026). DOI: 10.1177/09567976261434113

Comments

Popular

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

For years, scientists believed that adding even one qubit (a unit of quantum information) to a black hole needed energy. This was based on the idea that a black hole’s entropy must increase with more information, which means it must gain energy. But a new study by Jonah Kudler-Flam and Geoff Penington changes that thinking. They found that quantum information can be teleported into a black hole without adding energy or increasing entropy . This works through a process called black hole decoherence , where “soft” radiation — very low-energy signals — carry information into the black hole. In their method, the qubit enters the black hole while a new pair of entangled particles (like Hawking radiation) is created. This keeps the total information balanced, so there's no violation of the laws of physics. The energy cost only shows up when information is erased from the outside — these are called zerobits . According to Landauer’s principle, erasing information always needs energy. But ...

Black Holes That Never Dies

Black holes are powerful objects in space with gravity so strong that nothing can escape them. In the 1970s, Stephen Hawking showed that black holes can slowly lose energy by giving off tiny particles. This process is called Hawking radiation . Over time, the black hole gets smaller and hotter, and in the end, it disappears completely. But new research by Menezes and his team shows something different. Using a theory called Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) , they studied black holes with quantum corrections. In their model, the black hole does not vanish completely. Instead, it stops shrinking when it reaches a very small size. This leftover is called a black hole remnant . They also studied something called grey-body factors , which affect how much energy escapes from a black hole. Their findings show that the black hole cools down and stops losing mass once it reaches a minimum mass . This new model removes the idea of a “singularity” at the center of the black hole and gives us a better ...

How Planetary Movements Might Explain Sunspot Cycles and Solar Phenomena

Sunspots, dark patches on the Sun's surface, follow a cycle of increasing and decreasing activity every 11 years. For years, scientists have relied on the dynamo model to explain this cycle. According to this model, the Sun's magnetic field is generated by the movement of plasma and the Sun's rotation. However, this model does not fully explain why the sunspot cycle is sometimes unpredictable. Lauri Jetsu, a researcher, has proposed a new approach. Jetsu’s analysis, using a method called the Discrete Chi-square Method (DCM), suggests that planetary movements, especially those of Earth, Jupiter, and Mercury, play a key role in driving the sunspot cycle. His theory focuses on Flux Transfer Events (FTEs), where the magnetic fields of these planets interact with the Sun’s magnetic field. These interactions could create the sunspots and explain other solar phenomena like the Sun’s magnetic polarity reversing every 11 years. The Sun, our closest star, has been a subject of scient...