Skip to main content

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

3 comments

Scientists Might Have Discovered First Star That Eat It's Own Planets

Astronomers may have found evidence that a distant star consumed some of its own planets, helping solve a long-standing mystery about a strange pair of stars that should look almost identical—but do not.

A new study has examined an unusual binary star system called HD 81809 and discovered clues suggesting that one of the stars may have swallowed large amounts of planetary material. The findings offer a possible explanation for a puzzling chemical imbalance that has confused scientists for years.

The research was recently uploaded to the arXiv preprint server and explores how a dramatic planetary engulfment event could have changed the chemistry of one star while leaving its companion largely untouched.

A Tale of Two Stars

Binary star systems contain two stars that orbit each other. In most cases, these stars form together from the same giant cloud of gas and dust. Because they share the same birthplace, astronomers expect them to have nearly identical ages and chemical compositions.

That is why the HD 81809 system is so unusual.

The system contains two stars that are both similar to our Sun. However, when scientists studied them closely, they found major differences in their chemical makeup.

The larger star, known as HD 81809A, has already left the main stage of its life. It has exhausted much of the hydrogen fuel in its core and entered a phase known as the subgiant stage. It is no longer a typical main-sequence star but has not yet become a giant star.

Its companion, HD 81809B, is still a normal main-sequence star and continues to burn hydrogen in its core.

At first glance, this difference in evolutionary stage is not surprising. What shocked astronomers was the huge difference in the amount of heavy elements found in the two stars.

The Chemical Paradox

In astronomy, elements heavier than hydrogen and helium are often called "metals." The amount of these metals inside a star provides important clues about its history.

HD 81809A appears to be surprisingly poor in metals, particularly iron. Meanwhile, HD 81809B contains significantly more iron and has a composition much closer to that of our Sun.

The difference is enormous by stellar standards.

Scientists measured a discrepancy of about 0.57 dex in iron abundance between the two stars. Such a large gap is difficult to explain if both stars formed from the same cloud of material.

Adding to the mystery, HD 81809B also contains an unusually high amount of lithium.

Lithium is a fragile element that is normally destroyed inside stars over time. When astronomers find excess lithium on a star's surface, it often suggests that something unusual happened in the star's recent past.

Together, the iron-rich composition and lithium enrichment created what researchers describe as a chemical paradox.

Why would two stars born together look so different today?

A Previous Clue: A Debris Disk

Scientists had already suspected that something dramatic occurred around HD 81809B.

Earlier observations detected a debris disk within the system. A debris disk is a collection of dust, rocks, and planetary fragments orbiting a star.

Such disks can form when planets collide, break apart, or are disturbed by gravitational interactions.

A previous study suggested that HD 81809B might have recently absorbed material from planets or planetary debris. If true, the event could have altered the chemistry of the star's outer layers.

The new research set out to test this idea in greater detail.

Simulating a Planetary Feast

To investigate the mystery, a team led by Nuno Moedas from the Technical University of Denmark used advanced computer simulations.

The researchers employed a powerful stellar evolution program called the Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics, commonly known as MESA.

Their goal was to determine whether swallowing planets could realistically explain the unusual chemistry of HD 81809B.

The team modeled many different scenarios involving the accretion—or absorption—of planetary material. They varied both the amount of material and its chemical composition to see which combinations best matched the observations.

The simulations produced a fascinating result.

How Much Material Was Needed?

According to the models, HD 81809B would need to absorb a massive amount of metal-rich material to reach its current chemical state.

The researchers estimate that the star may have consumed the equivalent of roughly 25 to 75 Earth masses worth of metals.

That is an astonishing amount of planetary material.

However, timing turned out to be just as important as quantity.

If the engulfment happened early in the star's life, the required amount of material would rise dramatically—to around 150 Earth masses of metals.

The researchers consider such a scenario unlikely because it would require an unrealistically large reservoir of planetary material.

Instead, the simulations suggest that any engulfment event probably happened relatively recently, when the star was already billions of years old.

The estimated age of the system is around 10 billion years.

This means that the star may have swallowed planets long after they originally formed.

A New Problem Emerges

While the planet-engulfment theory successfully explains the star's high metallicity, it creates another challenge.

The simulations predict much more lithium than astronomers actually observe.

If HD 81809B absorbed enough planetary material to explain its iron abundance, the star's surface should contain far higher lithium levels than current measurements show.

To match the observed lithium abundance, the star would need to absorb less than six Earth masses of material.

This creates a contradiction.

A large amount of planetary material explains the metal enrichment but produces too much lithium. A smaller amount matches the lithium observations but cannot fully explain the metal content.

Researchers describe this as a tension within the model.

The solution may depend on understanding exactly what kind of planetary material was consumed. Different planets and planetary fragments contain different chemical mixtures, which could affect the final outcome.

The Most Plausible Explanation So Far

Despite the lithium problem, the researchers believe planet engulfment remains the strongest explanation available.

Alternative theories struggle to reproduce the unusual combination of age, brightness, metallicity, and lithium abundance observed in the system.

The idea that HD 81809B consumed one or more planets provides a natural way to explain why it appears chemically different from its stellar companion.

If true, the event would represent a dramatic example of how planetary systems can evolve over billions of years.

Instead of remaining stable forever, planets can sometimes spiral inward, collide with their host stars, or be thrown into chaotic orbits that eventually lead to destruction.

What Happens Next?

Astronomers are now searching for additional evidence that could confirm the planetary engulfment scenario.

One promising clue would be unusual stellar rotation or magnetic activity.

When a star swallows planets, it can gain extra angular momentum, causing it to spin faster than expected. This process may also affect the star's magnetic field.

Future observations of HD 81809B could reveal these signatures and help determine whether the star truly experienced a planetary feast.

For now, the system remains one of the most intriguing stellar mysteries known.

If the new interpretation is correct, HD 81809B may serve as a rare cosmic crime scene—one where the missing planets have already vanished, leaving behind only subtle chemical fingerprints as evidence of their fate.

The study reminds us that planetary systems are far more dynamic and unpredictable than once believed. Even after billions of years, the relationship between stars and their planets can end in a spectacular and unexpected way: the star may simply eat its own worlds.

References: (1) Nuno Moedas et al, Chemical paradox in a binary system: Exploring metal enrichment in HD 81809B, arXiv (2026). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2605.31060 (2) Maria Pia Di Mauro et al, On the Contradictory Case of the Binary System HD 81809 Hosting Two Pulsating Solar-like Stars Observed by TESS, The Astrophysical Journal (2026). DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae40ad

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

For years, scientists believed that adding even one qubit (a unit of quantum information) to a black hole needed energy. This was based on the idea that a black hole’s entropy must increase with more information, which means it must gain energy. But a new study by Jonah Kudler-Flam and Geoff Penington changes that thinking. They found that quantum information can be teleported into a black hole without adding energy or increasing entropy . This works through a process called black hole decoherence , where “soft” radiation — very low-energy signals — carry information into the black hole. In their method, the qubit enters the black hole while a new pair of entangled particles (like Hawking radiation) is created. This keeps the total information balanced, so there's no violation of the laws of physics. The energy cost only shows up when information is erased from the outside — these are called zerobits . According to Landauer’s principle, erasing information always needs energy. But ...
3 comments
Read more

Black Holes That Never Dies

Black holes are powerful objects in space with gravity so strong that nothing can escape them. In the 1970s, Stephen Hawking showed that black holes can slowly lose energy by giving off tiny particles. This process is called Hawking radiation . Over time, the black hole gets smaller and hotter, and in the end, it disappears completely. But new research by Menezes and his team shows something different. Using a theory called Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) , they studied black holes with quantum corrections. In their model, the black hole does not vanish completely. Instead, it stops shrinking when it reaches a very small size. This leftover is called a black hole remnant . They also studied something called grey-body factors , which affect how much energy escapes from a black hole. Their findings show that the black hole cools down and stops losing mass once it reaches a minimum mass . This new model removes the idea of a “singularity” at the center of the black hole and gives us a better ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How Planetary Movements Might Explain Sunspot Cycles and Solar Phenomena

Sunspots, dark patches on the Sun's surface, follow a cycle of increasing and decreasing activity every 11 years. For years, scientists have relied on the dynamo model to explain this cycle. According to this model, the Sun's magnetic field is generated by the movement of plasma and the Sun's rotation. However, this model does not fully explain why the sunspot cycle is sometimes unpredictable. Lauri Jetsu, a researcher, has proposed a new approach. Jetsu’s analysis, using a method called the Discrete Chi-square Method (DCM), suggests that planetary movements, especially those of Earth, Jupiter, and Mercury, play a key role in driving the sunspot cycle. His theory focuses on Flux Transfer Events (FTEs), where the magnetic fields of these planets interact with the Sun’s magnetic field. These interactions could create the sunspots and explain other solar phenomena like the Sun’s magnetic polarity reversing every 11 years. The Sun, our closest star, has been a subject of scient...
Post a Comment
Read more