Skip to main content

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

3 comments

What Happens When Bubbles Get Crowded? Scientists Just Found a Surprising Answer

Bubbles may look simple and playful, but their behavior reveals deep and fascinating physics. From the foam on your coffee to industrial emulsions and even biological systems, bubbles and droplets constantly merge, reshape, and reorganize. This process, known as coalescence, plays a major role in determining how soft materials behave. Now, new research by Kim and team uncovers an unexpected twist: when bubbles are tightly packed together, they stop following one of their most fundamental rules.

What Is Coalescence Preference?

When two bubbles of different sizes merge, the resulting “daughter” bubble does not form exactly in the middle. Instead, it tends to appear closer to the larger parent bubble. This behavior is known as coalescence preference. In simple terms, the bigger bubble “pulls” the merged bubble toward itself.

This effect has often been described with a catchy analogy: the rich get richer. The larger bubble effectively gains more influence during the merging process, drawing the final bubble closer to its side.

Scientists previously explained this behavior using surface energy release. When bubbles merge, they reduce their total surface area, releasing energy. The way this energy redistributes drives the motion of the newly formed bubble. In free, isolated conditions, this process follows a predictable mathematical pattern, where the position of the merged bubble strongly depends on the size difference between the parent bubbles.

A New Question: What Happens in Crowded Systems?

While coalescence preference is well understood for isolated bubbles, real-world systems are rarely so simple. In nature and industry, bubbles and droplets are often found in tightly packed clusters, such as foams or emulsions. In these environments, bubbles are surrounded by neighbors, leaving very little free space to move.

This raises an important question:
Does coalescence preference still work the same way when bubbles are crowded together?

Answering this question is not easy. Traditional optical imaging methods struggle to see what happens deep inside dense clusters. Individual bubbles overlap visually, making it nearly impossible to track specific merging events.

Seeing the Invisible with X-Ray Microscopy

To overcome this challenge, Kim and team used high-speed, high-resolution X-ray microscopy. Unlike visible light, X-rays can penetrate dense materials, allowing researchers to observe events happening inside tightly packed clusters.

Using this advanced technique, the team studied microbubbles suspended in water, with a packing density of about 40%. This means the bubbles were close enough to influence each other, but still had some liquid space between them.

For the first time, researchers could clearly visualize individual coalescence events inside such a crowded environment.

A Surprising Discovery

What they found was unexpected:
Coalescence preference becomes weaker in crowded systems.

Instead of strongly shifting toward the larger bubble, the merged bubble forms closer to the center than predicted. In other words, the “rich get richer” effect is partially blocked.

This change is reflected in the mathematical relationship between bubble sizes and final position. In free systems, this relationship follows a steep trend, described by an exponent of about 5. But in densely packed systems, the exponent drops to around 2.

This may sound like a small numerical change, but it represents a major shift in behavior. It means that the influence of bubble size is significantly reduced when bubbles are confined.

Why Does This Happen?

The answer lies in two competing forces:

  1. Laplace Pressure Difference
    Smaller bubbles have higher internal pressure than larger ones. This pressure difference pushes gas from the smaller bubble toward the larger one during coalescence. It is the main driver behind coalescence preference.

  2. Confinement Pressure from Neighboring Bubbles
    In a dense cluster, surrounding bubbles act like a barrier. They create a kind of “crowding pressure” that resists movement.

In free space, the Laplace pressure dominates, allowing the merged bubble to shift strongly toward the larger parent. But in a crowded system, the confinement pressure becomes comparable in strength.

As a result, the motion of the merged bubble is restricted. It cannot move as freely toward the larger bubble, leading to a weaker coalescence preference.

A Balance of Forces

The researchers found that these two pressures are surprisingly similar in magnitude under their experimental conditions. This balance explains why the behavior changes so dramatically.

  • If Laplace pressure dominates → strong coalescence preference (free bubbles)

  • If confinement pressure competes → weaker preference (dense systems)

This insight highlights how environment matters just as much as intrinsic properties. Even a well-understood phenomenon can behave very differently when conditions change.

Why This Matters

Understanding how bubbles merge is not just an academic exercise. It has real-world implications across many fields:

  • Food science: Stability of foams in products like whipped cream

  • Pharmaceuticals: Behavior of emulsions and drug delivery systems

  • Materials science: Design of lightweight and porous materials

  • Biology: Cell aggregation and membrane interactions

In all these systems, particles often exist in crowded environments. Assuming they behave like isolated units can lead to inaccurate predictions.

This research shows that dense packing can fundamentally alter dynamics, not just slightly modify them.

The Power of Advanced Imaging

Another important takeaway is the role of X-ray microscopy. Without it, these findings would not have been possible. The ability to observe individual events inside dense structures opens new doors for studying complex systems.

This technique could be applied to many other problems in soft matter and biomedical science, where internal dynamics are difficult to access.

Looking Ahead

Kim and team’s work challenges a long-standing assumption about coalescence. It shows that what seems like a universal rule can break down under realistic conditions.

Future research may explore:

  • Different packing densities

  • Other soft matter systems like droplets or cells

  • The role of fluid properties such as viscosity

By expanding these studies, scientists can build a more complete picture of how materials behave in real environments.

Final Thoughts

Bubbles may appear simple, but their interactions are anything but trivial. This study reminds us that context shapes behavior. When bubbles are free, they follow clear rules. But when they are crowded, those rules bend.

In the end, the story of coalescence preference is not just about bubbles—it’s about how systems adapt when space becomes limited. And as this research shows, even the smallest details can lead to big discoveries.

Reference: Kim, Y., Lim, S., Gim, B. et al. Coalescence preference in densely packed microbubbles. Sci Rep 5, 7739 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07739

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

For years, scientists believed that adding even one qubit (a unit of quantum information) to a black hole needed energy. This was based on the idea that a black hole’s entropy must increase with more information, which means it must gain energy. But a new study by Jonah Kudler-Flam and Geoff Penington changes that thinking. They found that quantum information can be teleported into a black hole without adding energy or increasing entropy . This works through a process called black hole decoherence , where “soft” radiation — very low-energy signals — carry information into the black hole. In their method, the qubit enters the black hole while a new pair of entangled particles (like Hawking radiation) is created. This keeps the total information balanced, so there's no violation of the laws of physics. The energy cost only shows up when information is erased from the outside — these are called zerobits . According to Landauer’s principle, erasing information always needs energy. But ...
3 comments
Read more

Black Holes That Never Dies

Black holes are powerful objects in space with gravity so strong that nothing can escape them. In the 1970s, Stephen Hawking showed that black holes can slowly lose energy by giving off tiny particles. This process is called Hawking radiation . Over time, the black hole gets smaller and hotter, and in the end, it disappears completely. But new research by Menezes and his team shows something different. Using a theory called Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) , they studied black holes with quantum corrections. In their model, the black hole does not vanish completely. Instead, it stops shrinking when it reaches a very small size. This leftover is called a black hole remnant . They also studied something called grey-body factors , which affect how much energy escapes from a black hole. Their findings show that the black hole cools down and stops losing mass once it reaches a minimum mass . This new model removes the idea of a “singularity” at the center of the black hole and gives us a better ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How Planetary Movements Might Explain Sunspot Cycles and Solar Phenomena

Sunspots, dark patches on the Sun's surface, follow a cycle of increasing and decreasing activity every 11 years. For years, scientists have relied on the dynamo model to explain this cycle. According to this model, the Sun's magnetic field is generated by the movement of plasma and the Sun's rotation. However, this model does not fully explain why the sunspot cycle is sometimes unpredictable. Lauri Jetsu, a researcher, has proposed a new approach. Jetsu’s analysis, using a method called the Discrete Chi-square Method (DCM), suggests that planetary movements, especially those of Earth, Jupiter, and Mercury, play a key role in driving the sunspot cycle. His theory focuses on Flux Transfer Events (FTEs), where the magnetic fields of these planets interact with the Sun’s magnetic field. These interactions could create the sunspots and explain other solar phenomena like the Sun’s magnetic polarity reversing every 11 years. The Sun, our closest star, has been a subject of scient...
Post a Comment
Read more