Skip to main content

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

3 comments

How Strong Is Cosmic Dust?

Debris disks are large rings or disks of dust and solid material found around many stars. They are common in planetary systems and are often seen as glowing rings in telescope images. Even though they look calm and beautiful, debris disks are actually very active and violent places. Inside them, countless particles are constantly colliding, breaking, bouncing, and slowly turning large objects into fine dust.

What we observe from Earth is not the big objects in these disks, but the tiny dust grains. These grains reflect starlight and emit heat, making the disk visible. To correctly understand what we see, scientists must understand how this dust is created and how it behaves over time.

A key question behind all this is surprisingly simple: how strong is cosmic dust?

What Are Debris Disks Made Of?

Debris disks contain solid objects of many sizes. At the largest end, there may be bodies as big as dwarf planets, hundreds or even thousands of kilometers wide. At the smallest end are dust grains only a few micrometers across, smaller than a grain of sand.

Telescopes cannot see the large objects directly. They only detect the dust. This dust cannot survive forever because radiation from the star slowly pushes small grains out of the system or destroys them. This means the dust must be continuously replaced.

The main way new dust is created is through collisions. Large objects collide and break into smaller pieces. These pieces collide again and again, forming a process called a collisional cascade. Over time, this cascade produces huge amounts of fine dust that make the disk visible.

Why Dust Strength Is So Important

Not all collisions are the same. What happens during a collision depends on two main factors:

  1. Collision speed – how fast the particles hit each other.

  2. Dust strength – how resistant the particles are to breaking.

Scientists can estimate collision speeds fairly well by studying the disk’s shape and thickness. But dust strength is much harder to measure. Laboratory experiments are difficult because the particles are extremely small and the collision speeds are high. Computer simulations also struggle because scientists do not know the exact composition or internal structure of the dust grains.

Some dust grains may be solid rocks, while others may be fluffy, porous clumps of material. This uncertainty makes it very hard to know how easily dust breaks apart.

The Meaning of QD∗

To describe how strong a dust grain is, scientists use a quantity called critical fragmentation energy, written as QD∗. This value tells us how much energy is needed to completely break a particle apart.

  • A low QD∗ means weak dust that breaks easily.

  • A high QD∗ means strong dust that can survive many impacts.

Knowing the correct value of QD∗ is essential for predicting how debris disks evolve and what they should look like.

Conflicting Results from Recent Studies

Recent research has given mixed answers about dust strength:

  • Studies of dust in our own Solar System suggest that dust might be much stronger than scientists previously thought.

  • On the other hand, observations of the debris disk around Fomalhaut suggest that the dust there is relatively weak. These observations include data from the James Webb Space Telescope, which revealed warm dust closer to the star.

These opposite results raised an important question: How strong can debris-disk dust really be without contradicting what we observe?

Testing Different Dust Strengths

To answer this, researchers Stein, Krivov, and Löhne created computer models of debris disks. They tested dust with very different strengths by changing the QD∗ value over a wide range—about a thousand times from weakest to strongest.

Their models did not assume that every collision destroys particles. Instead, they included several possible outcomes:

  • Disruptive collisions, where particles shatter into many pieces.

  • Cratering collisions, where only part of a particle is chipped away.

  • Rebounding (bouncing) collisions, where particles collide and bounce off each other with only small damage.

This realistic approach allowed the researchers to see how different types of collisions shape the disk over time.

When Dust Is Too Strong: The Rebounding Regime

The study found an important result. When the dust becomes stronger than a certain limit, collisions stop being destructive. Instead, most collisions become rebounding collisions.

In rebounding collisions:

  • Both particles survive.

  • Only a tiny amount of mass is lost.

  • Very little new dust is created.

For a typical debris disk located about 100 astronomical units from a Sun-like star, this change happens when QD∗ reaches about 10⁹ to 10¹⁰ erg per gram for micrometer-sized grains.

Above this limit, the behavior of the entire disk changes.

A Very Different Dust Distribution

In disks dominated by rebounding collisions, dust evolves in an unusual way:

  • Dust is created in a main belt of larger objects, similar to the Kuiper Belt in our Solar System.

  • Radiation pressure pushes small dust grains onto stretched, elliptical orbits, forming a dust halo outside the main belt.

  • Collisions in the halo create even smaller particles.

  • Radiation pressure then places these tiny particles into nearly circular orbits farther from the star.

At each distance from the star, the disk becomes dominated by grains of a specific size. The farther out you go, the smaller the grains become. Because collisions are mostly rebounding, these grains survive for a long time.

This leads to a strange result: the brightness of the disk increases with distance from the star outside the main belt.

Observations Do Not Support This

Real debris disks do not behave this way. Observations, especially in scattered light, show that disk brightness usually decreases with distance from the star.

Because disks dominated by rebounding collisions would look very different from what astronomers actually see, the researchers could place a strong upper limit on how strong debris-disk dust can be.

They also derived a simple formula showing that the maximum allowed QD∗ depends on orbital speed. For typical systems, this again leads to a limit of about 10⁹–10¹⁰ erg g⁻¹ for micrometer-sized dust grains.

Which Observations Matter Most?

The study also compared different observable properties of debris disks:

  • Overall brightness over time changes similarly for weak and strong dust.

  • Spectral energy distributions, which show how disks emit light at different wavelengths, are also quite similar.

  • Radial brightness profiles, which show how brightness changes with distance from the star, are very sensitive to dust strength.

This means that high-quality images of debris disks are one of the best tools for learning about the physical properties of cosmic dust.

Why Bouncing Still Matters

Even though rebounding collisions do not dominate disk evolution in real systems, the study highlights an important fact: bouncing collisions are actually very common. They happen more often than destructive collisions in all debris disks.

While they do not dramatically reshape the disk, they play a constant background role and must be included in accurate models.

What This Study Teaches Us

This research provides a clear and simple message. Cosmic dust can be stronger than scientists once believed, but there is a firm upper limit. If dust were too hard, debris disks would look very different from what we observe.

By connecting physical models with real telescope images, astronomers can now better understand the hidden properties of dust grains. In doing so, they learn not only how debris disks work, but also how planetary systems evolve and change over time.

In the end, the soft glow of debris disks across the universe quietly reveals the true strength of cosmic dust.

Reference: Tobias Stein, Alexander V. Krivov, Torsten Löhne, "How hard is dust in debris disks?", Arxiv, 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13051



Technical Terms 

Debris Disk

A debris disk is a large ring or disk of dust and solid material that surrounds a star. It forms from leftover material after planets are created and is kept active by constant collisions between objects inside the disk.

Dust Grains

Dust grains are extremely tiny solid particles found in debris disks. They are much smaller than sand grains and are the main reason debris disks can be seen by telescopes.

Collisional Cascade

A collisional cascade is a process where large objects collide and break into smaller pieces. Those pieces collide again, making even smaller fragments, until very fine dust is produced.

Critical Fragmentation Energy (QD∗)

QD∗ is a scientific measure of how much energy is needed to completely break a dust particle apart. If the value is high, the dust is strong. If the value is low, the dust breaks easily.

Disruptive Collision

A disruptive collision is a strong impact where particles break into many smaller fragments instead of surviving the collision.

Cratering Collision

A cratering collision happens when an object is hit but not destroyed. Only a small amount of material is knocked off, leaving a crater on the surface.

Rebounding (Bouncing) Collision

A rebounding collision occurs when two particles collide and bounce away from each other. Both particles survive, and only very small amounts of material are lost.

Radiation Pressure

Radiation pressure is the force caused by light coming from a star. This light can push very small dust grains outward, changing their orbits or even removing them from the disk.

Blowout Size

The blowout size is the smallest size a dust grain can have and still stay around a star. Grains smaller than this size are pushed out of the system by radiation pressure.

Parent Planetesimal Belt

The parent planetesimal belt is the main ring of large solid bodies in a debris disk. Collisions in this belt produce the dust seen in the disk.

Dust Halo

A dust halo is a wide, faint cloud of dust that extends beyond the main belt. It forms when small dust grains are pushed onto stretched orbits by radiation pressure.

Keplerian Speed

Keplerian speed is the natural speed at which an object moves while orbiting a star. Objects closer to the star move faster, while objects farther away move more slowly.

Radial Brightness Profile

A radial brightness profile shows how the brightness of a debris disk changes with distance from the star. It helps scientists understand how dust is distributed across the disk.

Spectral Energy Distribution (SED)

A spectral energy distribution is a graph that shows how much energy a disk emits at different wavelengths of light. It helps determine dust temperature, size, and quantity.

Scattered Light

Scattered light is starlight that reflects off dust grains and travels toward telescopes. Many debris disks are observed using scattered light images.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

For years, scientists believed that adding even one qubit (a unit of quantum information) to a black hole needed energy. This was based on the idea that a black hole’s entropy must increase with more information, which means it must gain energy. But a new study by Jonah Kudler-Flam and Geoff Penington changes that thinking. They found that quantum information can be teleported into a black hole without adding energy or increasing entropy . This works through a process called black hole decoherence , where “soft” radiation — very low-energy signals — carry information into the black hole. In their method, the qubit enters the black hole while a new pair of entangled particles (like Hawking radiation) is created. This keeps the total information balanced, so there's no violation of the laws of physics. The energy cost only shows up when information is erased from the outside — these are called zerobits . According to Landauer’s principle, erasing information always needs energy. But ...
3 comments
Read more

Black Holes That Never Dies

Black holes are powerful objects in space with gravity so strong that nothing can escape them. In the 1970s, Stephen Hawking showed that black holes can slowly lose energy by giving off tiny particles. This process is called Hawking radiation . Over time, the black hole gets smaller and hotter, and in the end, it disappears completely. But new research by Menezes and his team shows something different. Using a theory called Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) , they studied black holes with quantum corrections. In their model, the black hole does not vanish completely. Instead, it stops shrinking when it reaches a very small size. This leftover is called a black hole remnant . They also studied something called grey-body factors , which affect how much energy escapes from a black hole. Their findings show that the black hole cools down and stops losing mass once it reaches a minimum mass . This new model removes the idea of a “singularity” at the center of the black hole and gives us a better ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How Planetary Movements Might Explain Sunspot Cycles and Solar Phenomena

Sunspots, dark patches on the Sun's surface, follow a cycle of increasing and decreasing activity every 11 years. For years, scientists have relied on the dynamo model to explain this cycle. According to this model, the Sun's magnetic field is generated by the movement of plasma and the Sun's rotation. However, this model does not fully explain why the sunspot cycle is sometimes unpredictable. Lauri Jetsu, a researcher, has proposed a new approach. Jetsu’s analysis, using a method called the Discrete Chi-square Method (DCM), suggests that planetary movements, especially those of Earth, Jupiter, and Mercury, play a key role in driving the sunspot cycle. His theory focuses on Flux Transfer Events (FTEs), where the magnetic fields of these planets interact with the Sun’s magnetic field. These interactions could create the sunspots and explain other solar phenomena like the Sun’s magnetic polarity reversing every 11 years. The Sun, our closest star, has been a subject of scient...
Post a Comment
Read more