Skip to main content

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

Post a Comment

A New Theory Suggests We Might Be the Universe’s Only Civilization—Here’s Why

For as long as humans have gazed at the night sky, we’ve wondered if someone—or something—is out there wondering about us too. The question “Are we alone in the universe?” is as old as curiosity itself. Ancient civilizations built myths, religions, and stories around celestial beings. Modern science, however, has transformed that timeless question into a structured search, armed with telescopes, equations, and now even statistical models.

We’ve discovered thousands of planets orbiting distant stars, many in so-called “habitable zones” where life could potentially exist. We’ve sent probes to the edges of our solar system, scanned the skies for alien radio signals, and studied the chemistry of interstellar clouds. Yet, despite all this, we’ve found no sign of intelligent life beyond Earth.

This mystery is famously captured by the Fermi Paradox, which asks: if intelligent life is common, where is everybody?

A recent study by Dr. Antal Veres of the Hungarian University of Agriculture, published in Acta Astronautica, proposes a new way to think about this mystery. His idea introduces a concept he calls the “Solitude Zone.” It might offer an explanation for why we appear to be alone—not because life is impossible elsewhere, but because the odds might simply favor just one civilization like ours existing at a time.

What Exactly Is the “Solitude Zone”?

Despite its name, the Solitude Zone isn’t a place—it’s a statistical concept. It describes a kind of “sweet spot” in probability space where the chances are highest that exactly one civilization of a certain level of complexity exists in the universe.

Imagine a bell curve. On one side, the odds of no intelligent life are high; on the other, the odds of many civilizations are high. The Solitude Zone is the peak in between, where the probability of there being exactly one civilization—like ours—is higher than both the chance of there being none and the chance of there being many.

In simpler terms: the Solitude Zone suggests it’s entirely possible for the universe to contain life, but just one species advanced enough to ask these questions. And, if Dr. Veres is right, that species might be us.

Revisiting the Classics: The Big Three Ideas That Led Here

To understand how the Solitude Zone model works, it helps to look at three cornerstone concepts in the search for extraterrestrial life: the Fermi Paradox, the Great Filter, and the Drake Equation, along with the Kardashev Scale.

1. The Fermi Paradox: “Where Is Everybody?”

The Fermi Paradox was born from a casual conversation in the 1950s between physicists Enrico Fermi and his colleagues. With billions of stars in our galaxy, many older than our Sun, Fermi reasoned that countless civilizations should have had time to arise, develop technology, and explore the stars. Yet, we see no sign of them.

Over the decades, scientists and philosophers have offered countless explanations—perhaps intelligent life is rare, or maybe advanced civilizations destroy themselves before reaching interstellar capability. Some argue we’re simply not looking in the right way. Others think advanced life might be avoiding us.

But none of these explanations are fully satisfying. The Solitude Zone provides a different kind of answer—not philosophical or speculative, but probabilistic.

2. The Great Filter: Evolution’s Toughest Obstacles

The Great Filter theory suggests that life must overcome a series of nearly impossible hurdles to reach advanced stages of development. The first “filter” might be the origin of life itself. The next could be the leap from single-celled organisms to complex multicellular life. Still later, it might be the evolution of intelligence, technology, or even long-term survival.

Each step is so unlikely that most planets never make it past the early stages. Earth, then, could be extraordinarily lucky—a planet that passed through several filters by sheer chance. According to this idea, either we’ve already passed the hardest steps (and we’re rare survivors), or the biggest filter still lies ahead (and our future may not be guaranteed).

The Solitude Zone concept borrows this idea of filters but uses it to describe how the odds of complex life shift statistically depending on how difficult those steps are.

3. The Kardashev Scale: Measuring Civilization Power

Developed by Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev, this scale measures a civilization’s advancement by the amount of energy it can harness:

  • Type I: Uses all available energy from its home planet (humanity is around 0.7 on this scale).

  • Type II: Taps into the total energy output of its star (think Dyson spheres).

  • Type III: Controls energy across an entire galaxy.

The Solitude Zone incorporates this idea too—civilizations can exist at different complexity levels, and their likelihood of being “alone” depends on how advanced they are. Interestingly, Dr. Veres’s calculations show that the more advanced a civilization becomes, the more likely it is to be alone.

4. The Drake Equation: Counting Civilizations

Proposed by astronomer Frank Drake in 1961, this equation estimates the number of civilizations in our galaxy capable of communication. It multiplies several factors: the rate of star formation, the number of planets per star, the fraction that develop life, the fraction that develop intelligence, and the lifetime of a civilization.

The equation was never meant to give a precise answer—it’s a framework for discussion. The Solitude Zone takes inspiration from the Drake Equation but applies it on a universal scale, considering all the potentially habitable planets in the observable universe—estimated at 10²⁴ (a number so huge it’s almost impossible to grasp).

How Dr. Veres’s Solitude Zone Works

Dr. Veres’s model combines these classic ideas into a new statistical framework built on four main components:

  1. Complexity: A measure of how advanced a lifeform is, from single-celled organisms to post-biological intelligences that have transcended organic form.

  2. Existence Likelihood: The probability that a civilization of at least that level of complexity exists somewhere in the universe.

  3. Emergence Probability: The odds that such a civilization would arise in only one place.

  4. Number of Systems: The total number of potential habitable worlds in the universe.

Using these factors, he calculated two conditions that define the Solitude Zone:

  • The probability that exactly one civilization of a given complexity exists is greater than the probability that multiple exist.

  • The probability that at least one civilization exists is greater than the probability that none exist.

In other words, the Solitude Zone describes a statistical balance point between “too rare” and “too common.”

Testing the Universe: Four Scenarios

Dr. Veres tested his model under four different hypothetical conditions, each representing a different way life might develop in the universe.

1. Astrobiological Optimism

In this scenario, life forms easily and evolves frequently. Planets across the cosmos teem with living beings, and many reach advanced technological levels.
Result: The Solitude Zone disappears—there are far too many civilizations for any to be “alone.”

2. Evolutionary Hard Step

Here, the Great Filter occurs very early—perhaps in the formation of multicellular life or the spark of intelligence.
Result: The likelihood of being in the Solitude Zone drops to nearly zero—not because there are others, but because no civilizations arise at all.

3. Rare Earth Hypothesis

This view suggests that while microbial life might be common, complex life is extraordinarily rare. The unique combination of conditions on Earth—its stable climate, magnetic field, moon, and plate tectonics—might almost never occur elsewhere.
Result: Humanity has a 29.1% chance of being in the Solitude Zone. We could indeed be the only intelligent civilization in existence right now.

4. Critical Earth Hypothesis

Dr. Veres’s own “sweet spot” model, this scenario sits at the delicate balance where complex life is possible but exceptionally uncommon.
Result: The probability of us being alone rises slightly to 30.3%, the highest in his framework.

In none of these scenarios does the chance exceed 50%. That means statistically, it’s still more likely that multiple civilizations exist—or that none do—than that we alone occupy the universe’s stage.

But there’s an intriguing twist: as civilizations grow more advanced (moving higher on the Kardashev Scale), the likelihood of those civilizations being alone increases. Super-advanced beings—if they exist—are more likely to be solitary than societies like ours.

What the Solitude Zone Means for Us

Dr. Veres’s Solitude Zone doesn’t give a definitive answer to whether we’re alone. Instead, it reframes the question. Rather than asking simply, “Is there life out there?” it asks, “Given the odds, how likely is it that only one civilization exists at our level right now?”

This subtle shift changes how we think about our place in the cosmos.

If we are in the Solitude Zone, it means we’re not an accident—but a statistical inevitability of a universe vast enough for one intelligent lifeform to appear. It also means that, while others may exist elsewhere—or may have existed long ago—we could be separated by millions or billions of years. In cosmic terms, that’s as isolating as being alone.

A Different Kind of Perspective

The Solitude Zone doesn’t just address scientific curiosity—it also touches something deeply human. It reminds us how fragile and precious life is. If the odds really do favor a single intelligent civilization per epoch, then our existence carries enormous weight. We may be the universe’s only current voice, its sole observer able to look back upon itself.

That realization is both sobering and inspiring. It means that everything we build, destroy, or discover might be the only record of consciousness the cosmos has right now.

Beyond the Numbers: Philosophical and Practical Implications

The implications of the Solitude Zone reach beyond mathematics.

  1. A Call for Responsibility
    If humanity is alone, then our survival becomes the universe’s survival of intelligence itself. Protecting our planet, avoiding self-destruction, and pursuing knowledge take on cosmic importance.

  2. The Timeline Problem
    Even if the Solitude Zone is correct, it doesn’t mean no other civilizations ever existed. They might simply be gone—wiped out by disasters, wars, or time itself. The universe is nearly 14 billion years old; entire intelligent species could have risen and vanished long before us.

  3. A Motivation to Explore
    The possibility of solitude shouldn’t lead to despair—it should drive us to reach farther. Sending probes, building telescopes, and exploring other worlds become not just scientific pursuits but acts of connection, attempts to ensure that if there’s someone else out there, we’ll eventually find them.

The Universe’s Quiet Symphony

Perhaps the most profound takeaway from the Solitude Zone is that it doesn’t require us to be pessimistic. Even if we are alone, the universe is still alive—with stars being born, galaxies colliding, and planets forming. Life, once it emerges, transforms matter into meaning. And whether that meaning exists only here, for now, doesn’t make it less valuable.

It may be that we are in the Solitude Zone today, but not forever. The cosmos is vast and ancient, and new worlds are forming even now. Somewhere, someday, another civilization may arise, look up at their own sky, and ask the same question we’re asking: Are we alone?

Final Thoughts: Between Silence and Wonder

Dr. Veres’s Solitude Zone offers a refreshing new lens through which to view one of humanity’s oldest questions. It blends astronomy, probability, and philosophy into a framework that doesn’t promise certainty but encourages humility.

We may be unique—not because life is impossible elsewhere, but because the odds of simultaneous civilizations are fleetingly small. For now, we may indeed be the universe’s solitary storytellers.

Yet, solitude need not mean sadness. If we are truly alone, then we are also the universe’s consciousness—its way of knowing itself. Every discovery, every act of kindness, every question we ask adds another spark of awareness to the cosmic dark.

Until we find evidence to the contrary, we may well inhabit the Solitude Zone. And in that quiet, infinite expanse, perhaps our greatest purpose is simply to keep listening.

Reference: Antal Veres, The solitude zone: A probabilistic window for singular lifeform existence, Acta Astronautica (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.09.082

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

For years, scientists believed that adding even one qubit (a unit of quantum information) to a black hole needed energy. This was based on the idea that a black hole’s entropy must increase with more information, which means it must gain energy. But a new study by Jonah Kudler-Flam and Geoff Penington changes that thinking. They found that quantum information can be teleported into a black hole without adding energy or increasing entropy . This works through a process called black hole decoherence , where “soft” radiation — very low-energy signals — carry information into the black hole. In their method, the qubit enters the black hole while a new pair of entangled particles (like Hawking radiation) is created. This keeps the total information balanced, so there's no violation of the laws of physics. The energy cost only shows up when information is erased from the outside — these are called zerobits . According to Landauer’s principle, erasing information always needs energy. But ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Black Holes That Never Dies

Black holes are powerful objects in space with gravity so strong that nothing can escape them. In the 1970s, Stephen Hawking showed that black holes can slowly lose energy by giving off tiny particles. This process is called Hawking radiation . Over time, the black hole gets smaller and hotter, and in the end, it disappears completely. But new research by Menezes and his team shows something different. Using a theory called Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) , they studied black holes with quantum corrections. In their model, the black hole does not vanish completely. Instead, it stops shrinking when it reaches a very small size. This leftover is called a black hole remnant . They also studied something called grey-body factors , which affect how much energy escapes from a black hole. Their findings show that the black hole cools down and stops losing mass once it reaches a minimum mass . This new model removes the idea of a “singularity” at the center of the black hole and gives us a better ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How Planetary Movements Might Explain Sunspot Cycles and Solar Phenomena

Sunspots, dark patches on the Sun's surface, follow a cycle of increasing and decreasing activity every 11 years. For years, scientists have relied on the dynamo model to explain this cycle. According to this model, the Sun's magnetic field is generated by the movement of plasma and the Sun's rotation. However, this model does not fully explain why the sunspot cycle is sometimes unpredictable. Lauri Jetsu, a researcher, has proposed a new approach. Jetsu’s analysis, using a method called the Discrete Chi-square Method (DCM), suggests that planetary movements, especially those of Earth, Jupiter, and Mercury, play a key role in driving the sunspot cycle. His theory focuses on Flux Transfer Events (FTEs), where the magnetic fields of these planets interact with the Sun’s magnetic field. These interactions could create the sunspots and explain other solar phenomena like the Sun’s magnetic polarity reversing every 11 years. The Sun, our closest star, has been a subject of scient...
Post a Comment
Read more