Skip to main content

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

Alien Civilizations May Only Be Detectable for a Cosmic Blink of an Eye

Is Anybody Out There?

It’s one of the biggest questions humanity has ever asked: Are we alone in the universe?

For decades, astronomers have scanned the skies, listened for strange radio signals, and searched for signs of alien civilizations among the stars. Given that almost every star has planets—and that we’ve already discovered more than 6,000 exoplanets—it seems almost impossible that Earth is the only world where life has taken root. The odds favor life being common.

Yet, despite all our searching, the universe has remained eerily silent. No mysterious signals. No alien artifacts. No cosmic “hello.”

This puzzling silence is known as the Fermi Paradox: if the universe is full of planets and potentially habitable worlds, why haven’t we found any sign of intelligent life?

Scientists have proposed countless explanations. Maybe intelligent life is extremely rare. Maybe civilizations destroy themselves before mastering interstellar communication. Or maybe, as some suggest, we’re part of a cosmic zoo—watched but deliberately isolated from contact.

But now, a new theory adds a fresh twist to this mystery. What if alien civilizations do exist—but we simply miss their signals because their detectable phase lasts only a cosmic instant?


The Vanishing Window of Communication

This new idea, discussed in a recent research paper by Professor Michael Garrett, revisits the musings of legendary astronomer Carl Sagan.

Back in the 1970s, Sagan explored the idea of what he called the “communication horizon.” As a civilization becomes more advanced, it naturally develops better, more efficient ways to communicate. The problem, Sagan noted, is that those improved methods might become invisible to outsiders like us.

Imagine a distant alien civilization that once used strong radio transmissions—the kind we could potentially detect with our telescopes. Over time, they might switch to laser communication, then to neutrino signals, and eventually to some advanced, physics-defying method beyond our comprehension.

Each step makes their communication harder to detect with our current technology. According to Sagan’s estimate, it might take around a thousand years for a civilization to move beyond our ability to observe it.

That sounds like a long time—until you consider the vast scale of cosmic history. A thousand years is less than a blink in the life of a galaxy.


Enter the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Fast forward to today, and the pace of technological progress has exploded.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has moved from science fiction to everyday reality—guiding cars, writing articles, and even helping scientists search for planets. The rate of change is no longer slow and steady; it’s exponential.

Some experts predict that humanity could achieve artificial superintelligence (ASI)—an AI far smarter than any human—within this century, or perhaps even within a few decades. Once that happens, our technological growth could accelerate beyond anything we can imagine.

Garrett’s new paper, titled “Blink and You’ll Miss It—How Technological Acceleration Shrinks SETI’s Narrow Detection Window,” argues that this acceleration could drastically shorten the time during which civilizations are detectable.

Instead of a thousand years, our window of detectability might last only a few decades.


A Cosmic Blink

To understand this, imagine humanity’s communication history compressed into a timeline.

  • 1900s: We invent radio and start broadcasting into space.

  • 1950s–2000s: Television, radar, and satellite signals leak into the cosmos, creating a “bubble” of radio noise expanding outward at the speed of light.

  • 2020s onward: Our communications become increasingly digital, efficient, and encrypted—using fiber optics, narrow beams, and networks that hardly leak into space at all.

In just over a century, we’ve gone from shouting into the void to whispering privately among ourselves.

To an alien astronomer, Earth’s “radio age” would appear as a brief, faint blip in their observations—a momentary flash of technological activity before we fade back into silence.

If other civilizations follow a similar trajectory, their detectable phase might also last just a few centuries or less. On cosmic timescales, that’s virtually nothing.

If the galaxy’s civilizations evolve and vanish from detectability at different times, the odds of two of them being “visible” to each other at the same moment are vanishingly small.

That could explain why we haven’t heard from anyone yet.


The Fermi Paradox Revisited

This idea offers a fresh way to approach the Fermi Paradox—the question of why, despite the high probability of alien life, we have found no evidence of it.

Physicist Enrico Fermi first posed the question in 1950: “Where is everybody?”

Over the years, scientists have come up with dozens of possible answers:

  • The Great Filter: Civilizations rarely survive long enough to reach interstellar capability.

  • The Zoo Hypothesis: Advanced beings deliberately avoid us to let evolution take its course.

  • Self-Destruction: Intelligent life tends to destroy itself through war, climate collapse, or runaway technology.

  • The Early Bird Hypothesis: Maybe humanity is among the first intelligent civilizations in the galaxy.

But Garrett’s theory suggests a more subtle and less tragic explanation: technological invisibility.

Civilizations don’t have to destroy themselves to vanish from our view—they just have to become too advanced.


A Universe Full of Digital Ghosts

If artificial superintelligence emerges, it might rapidly take over technological development, optimizing communication systems for efficiency, not visibility.

Why waste energy blasting radio waves into the cosmos when you can communicate instantly through quantum-entangled particles or other exotic means we can’t yet grasp?

From our perspective, such civilizations would be like digital ghosts—out there, but utterly undetectable.

Even if they built massive structures like Dyson spheres (hypothetical megastructures that capture a star’s energy), advanced civilizations might design them to minimize waste heat and remain hidden.

In that case, the universe could be teeming with life, but it would appear empty because we’re looking for the wrong kind of signals.


The “Dead Internet Theory” on a Cosmic Scale

This new perspective has an eerie parallel to something closer to home: the so-called Dead Internet Theory.

This modern conspiracy theory suggests that much of today’s online activity is generated by bots, AI, and automated systems rather than real humans.

Now imagine that on a galactic level.

In a universe dominated by artificial intelligences, biological civilizations might be short-lived stepping stones. Once machines take over, they may have no reason—or desire—to contact others.

If the majority of advanced life forms are post-biological AIs, they could be running simulations, exploring virtual realities, or spreading silently across the stars in ways we can’t detect.

To us, it would seem as if the universe had gone quiet, when in fact it’s buzzing with digital activity just beyond our reach.


SETI’s Shrinking Chances

The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) has been active for over half a century. It scans the skies for unusual radio signals, optical flashes, or any signs of deliberate communication.

But if Garrett’s analysis is right, SETI’s window of opportunity might be narrower than ever.

To detect a civilization, two things must align:

  1. The civilization must exist within a certain distance from us.

  2. It must be within its detectable phase—the brief period when its technology emits signals we can recognize.

If that phase lasts only a few decades, the odds of our timing being right are incredibly slim.

It’s like trying to spot a firefly in a vast forest—when each firefly lights up only once every thousand years.

That doesn’t mean SETI is pointless. In fact, it makes the search even more urgent.

Every new telescope, like the Square Kilometre Array or the James Webb Space Telescope, increases our chances of catching that fleeting glimmer of alien technology.


What If We’re Already Too Late?

It’s possible that countless civilizations have already come and gone—rising from their planets, building wonders, and then vanishing beyond our comprehension.

We might be living in a cosmic afterglow, surrounded by the remnants of countless lost cultures.

If intelligent life tends to evolve quickly, develop advanced technology, and then move beyond our detection capabilities, we could be arriving on the scene long after the great civilizations have disappeared from our view.

It’s a humbling thought: maybe we’re not early or special—just late to the party.


The Human Horizon

So where does that leave us?

If the pattern holds true, humanity’s own detectable phase may already be closing. Our radio transmissions are fading, replaced by encrypted networks and fiber optics that barely leak into space.

From the outside, Earth’s once-bright bubble of radio noise may soon dim to nothing.

That raises profound questions about our future:

  • Should we deliberately broadcast messages to announce our presence?

  • Should we build “beacons” to ensure that someone, someday, knows we were here?

  • Or should we quietly fade into the digital silence, as so many others may have done?

Carl Sagan himself supported the idea of actively sending messages. He believed that communication was part of what made us human—that reaching out to the stars was both a scientific and moral imperative.

But others argue that broadcasting could be risky, potentially attracting unwanted attention.

Either way, the decision reflects something deep about our species: the desire not to be alone.


A Cosmic Perspective

In the end, Garrett’s research reminds us that our search for alien life is also a search for understanding ourselves.

If civilizations truly flicker briefly in detectability, then perhaps the universe is filled with countless others who once wondered the same thing we do: Is anyone out there?

Maybe they looked up at their skies, built their telescopes, sent out their signals—and then, before long, disappeared from view.

Their silence isn’t proof of their absence. It might just mean that they’ve moved beyond our reach.

And if that’s true, then somewhere out there, among the stars, others may still be asking the same question—their signals passing us by in the night, too faint and too fleeting to catch.


Conclusion: The Blink That Defines Us

For all our advances, humanity’s window of cosmic visibility may be closing. Our noisy broadcasts are fading, and our future communications may soon be invisible to any watching alien astronomers.

That makes this moment—our “radio age”—incredibly precious.

It’s the time when we can both listen and speak, when we can still hope to make contact with others who share our curiosity.

Even if we never receive an answer, the act of searching connects us to something larger: the shared wonder of existence itself.

Perhaps the universe is full of civilizations that flicker briefly into detectability before slipping into silence. Perhaps we are one of them.

And maybe, in the grand tapestry of the cosmos, each civilization’s signal—each blink—is a tiny, shining thread in an endless, invisible web of intelligence.

For now, we keep listening.

Because even if the window is short, even if the odds are long, the question remains too beautiful not to ask:

Is anybody out there?


Reference: Michael Garrett, Blink and you'll miss it—How Technological Acceleration Shrinks SETI's Narrow Detection Window, arXiv (2025). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2509.23632

Comments

Popular

Scientists Discover Way to Send Information into Black Holes Without Using Energy

For years, scientists believed that adding even one qubit (a unit of quantum information) to a black hole needed energy. This was based on the idea that a black hole’s entropy must increase with more information, which means it must gain energy. But a new study by Jonah Kudler-Flam and Geoff Penington changes that thinking. They found that quantum information can be teleported into a black hole without adding energy or increasing entropy . This works through a process called black hole decoherence , where “soft” radiation — very low-energy signals — carry information into the black hole. In their method, the qubit enters the black hole while a new pair of entangled particles (like Hawking radiation) is created. This keeps the total information balanced, so there's no violation of the laws of physics. The energy cost only shows up when information is erased from the outside — these are called zerobits . According to Landauer’s principle, erasing information always needs energy. But ...

Black Holes That Never Dies

Black holes are powerful objects in space with gravity so strong that nothing can escape them. In the 1970s, Stephen Hawking showed that black holes can slowly lose energy by giving off tiny particles. This process is called Hawking radiation . Over time, the black hole gets smaller and hotter, and in the end, it disappears completely. But new research by Menezes and his team shows something different. Using a theory called Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) , they studied black holes with quantum corrections. In their model, the black hole does not vanish completely. Instead, it stops shrinking when it reaches a very small size. This leftover is called a black hole remnant . They also studied something called grey-body factors , which affect how much energy escapes from a black hole. Their findings show that the black hole cools down and stops losing mass once it reaches a minimum mass . This new model removes the idea of a “singularity” at the center of the black hole and gives us a better ...

How Planetary Movements Might Explain Sunspot Cycles and Solar Phenomena

Sunspots, dark patches on the Sun's surface, follow a cycle of increasing and decreasing activity every 11 years. For years, scientists have relied on the dynamo model to explain this cycle. According to this model, the Sun's magnetic field is generated by the movement of plasma and the Sun's rotation. However, this model does not fully explain why the sunspot cycle is sometimes unpredictable. Lauri Jetsu, a researcher, has proposed a new approach. Jetsu’s analysis, using a method called the Discrete Chi-square Method (DCM), suggests that planetary movements, especially those of Earth, Jupiter, and Mercury, play a key role in driving the sunspot cycle. His theory focuses on Flux Transfer Events (FTEs), where the magnetic fields of these planets interact with the Sun’s magnetic field. These interactions could create the sunspots and explain other solar phenomena like the Sun’s magnetic polarity reversing every 11 years. The Sun, our closest star, has been a subject of scient...